A Hawaii car accident claim can become complicated long before settlement. Insurance may be limited, medical records may be incomplete, or an adjuster may question how long an injury should last. At the Law Offices of David W. Barlow, we work through those issues by examining the evidence, identifying available coverage, and negotiating the individual claim.

​

These 20 anonymized client matters include settlements completed during the past two years. 

​

1. Looking beyond a limited policy after serious injuries

​

A rear-end collision left a client facing substantial neck treatment and difficulty returning to normal earnings. The available liability insurance was limited, and the insurer also raised the client’s earlier neck history.

We pursued medical and wage documentation, negotiated a personal contribution from the responsible driver, and pursued available underinsured motorist coverage. The recovery included liability insurance, a separate personal contribution, and additional insurance benefits. We also addressed the public-benefit reimbursement claim before final distribution.

​

2. Finding additional coverage after a bicycle accident

​

An injured bicyclist faced more than immediate physical pain. Continuing symptoms and anxiety around traffic also affected daily life, while the initial insurance offer fell well short of the eventual settlement.

​

We presented the continuing effects of the injuries, filed suit to preserve the claim, and pursued umbrella coverage in addition to the automobile policy. Both policies contributed to the settlement. Resolving the medical reimbursement claim afterward allowed additional funds to be released to the client.

​

3. Pursuing an uninsured motorist claim after an e-bike collision

​

An e-bike rider was injured when a vehicle turned across the rider’s path. The driver had no liability insurance, creating an immediate obstacle to recovering compensation for the injuries.

​

We pursued the client’s uninsured motorist coverage and negotiated beyond several successive offers. When discussions reached the point of considering arbitration, continued negotiations produced a higher agreed settlement. The absence of insurance on the other vehicle did not prevent a recovery under the client’s own policy.

​

4. Coordinating Hawaii liability insurance with an out-of-state policy

​

A moped crash caused an injury requiring surgery. The client had coverage connected to another state, and the available recovery depended on how that policy interacted with the responsible driver’s insurance.

​

We coordinated the liability settlement with the underinsured motorist claim and examined the policy’s reduction for the liability payment. Continued negotiation increased the underinsured motorist payment to the amount available under that policy after the reduction. The client recovered from both sources, rather than stopping with the first settlement.

​

5. Untangling rental-car insurance after a moped crash

​

A moped rider was struck by a turning vehicle that had been rented by a visiting driver. Different companies handled the driver’s liability insurance and the rental-related medical benefits, making it harder to determine where records and bills belonged.

​

We supplied accident and coverage information, coordinated with providers, and followed up when the claim stalled. We also negotiated beyond the liability insurer’s stated best offer. The resulting settlement exceeded that offer, while the coverage work helped clarify the handling of the client’s medical bills.

​

6. Pursuing an injury recovery without motorcycle medical benefits

​

An injured motorcyclist needed emergency treatment, but review of the motorcycle policy confirmed that it did not provide personal injury protection or uninsured or underinsured motorist benefits. Those missing coverages narrowed the available options.

​

We pursued the responsible driver’s bodily injury insurance and kept the injury claim distinct from the motorcycle’s property damage issues. The matter resulted in a negotiated injury settlement. Reviewing the actual policy benefits early helped focus the claim on an available source of recovery.

​

7. Challenging a fixed timetable for recovery from whiplash

​

After a rear-end collision, a client continued to experience neck and shoulder symptoms. The insurer’s evaluation relied in part on the position that the injury should have resolved within a relatively short period.

​

We pursued the treatment and work-restriction records and continued negotiations over the client’s actual course of recovery. The final settlement exceeded the earlier offers. We also addressed a disputed therapy balance and obtained the provider’s agreement to accept an identified payment as payment in full.

​

8. Following up on missing treatment records before settling

​

A collision caused injuries that led to treatment with several providers. Some therapy and billing records were slow to arrive, leaving gaps in the information available to evaluate the claim.

We followed up for the missing records and continued negotiating through a series of revised offers. The final settlement was substantially higher than the opening offer. Tracking the treatment documentation and outstanding bills helped prevent the claim from being evaluated solely on an incomplete initial file.

​

9. Keeping a smaller injury claim moving through billing problems

​

A client with neck, shoulder, and back complaints encountered treatment-billing difficulties as available no-fault benefits were used up. Questions about prescriptions and supporting documents complicated the medical-payment process.

​

We followed up on the supporting records, directed attention to the appropriate medical-benefit claim, and sought documentation of lost earnings. Continued liability negotiations produced a settlement above the initial offer.

 

The matter illustrates why smaller Hawaii auto injury claims still benefit from attention to coverage, documentation, and follow-through.

​

10. Including transportation expenses in the settlement discussion

​

A car accident left a client with head and neck complaints, follow-up care, and transportation expenses. The client’s own policy did not include rental-car coverage, so those expenses required attention outside that benefit.

​

We forwarded rental and ride receipts to the responsible driver’s insurer for consideration alongside the injury claim. Negotiations produced a higher settlement than the opening offer. We also explained the difference between the final liability release and the separate medical benefits still available under the client’s policy.

​

11. Continuing after the responsible driver’s policy was exhausted

​

A client injured in a Hawaii rear-end collision continued treatment after returning home to another state. The responsible driver’s liability coverage was limited, making the next available insurance source important.

​

We negotiated the liability payment up to that policy’s limit and then pursued underinsured motorist benefits under the client’s own insurance. Further negotiations increased that additional payment. The combined recovery exceeded the responsible driver’s policy alone, with the payments evaluated under the applicable policy terms and offsets.

​

12. Presenting a visitor’s treatment after the Hawaii trip ended

​

A passenger injured in a Hawaii collision returned to the mainland with continuing neck, back, and shoulder complaints. Treatment away from the accident location still needed to be considered in evaluating the injury claim.

​

We pursued the bodily injury claim using the client’s treatment information and negotiated from the initial offer to the available liability policy limit. We also investigated possible additional insurance rather than assuming another source existed. The result was a policy-limit settlement supported by an assessment of the coverage actually available.

​

13. Obtaining an additional recovery after a multi-vehicle collision

​

A rear-end impact pushed a client’s vehicle into another vehicle. Neck and back complaints and headaches led to an injury claim, but the responsible driver’s available insurance did not end the coverage inquiry.

​

After obtaining the liability policy limit, we pursued a separate underinsured motorist claim. That claim produced an additional payment beyond the liability settlement. The result shows why receiving one insurer’s check can be a step in the recovery process rather than the end of the coverage review.

​

14. Resolving an outstanding treatment balance alongside settlement

​

A rear-end collision led to back treatment, missed work, and an outstanding therapy balance after medical benefits were exhausted. Reaching agreement with the liability insurer would not, by itself, resolve that unpaid bill.

We obtained the no-fault claim information, presented the injury demand after treatment concluded, and secured the available liability policy limit. The outstanding treatment balance was then paid from the settlement. Addressing the bill as part of the closing process gave the client a clearer picture of the remaining proceeds.

​

15. Checking a large hospital balance against actual insurance payments

​

After a vehicle-related injury, a client faced a large hospital statement and limited liability insurance. The balance initially presented raised serious concerns about how much of any settlement would remain.

​

We examined the billing and insurance information and explained the difference between the hospital’s original charges, contractual adjustments, insurance payments, and the remaining patient balance. The liability policy limit was recovered. That review gave the client a more accurate basis for addressing the bill instead of treating the original charges as the final amount owed.

​

16. Negotiating a claim involving a short course of treatment

​

A rear-end collision resulted in head and neck symptoms and emergency care, followed by a relatively limited treatment history. The insurer’s initial injury offer was low, reflecting its assessment of that short course of care.

We continued negotiating on the documented claim and obtained a settlement above the opening offer. A shorter treatment history requires a realistic evaluation, but it does not eliminate the value of careful negotiation. The client received an increased recovery without the claim being presented as a catastrophic injury.

​

17. Finding coverage on a borrowed vehicle

​

A moped rider was injured by a turning vehicle. Coverage was complicated because the person driving was not the vehicle’s owner, and a separate insurance inquiry did not produce another liability payment.

​

We pursued coverage under the vehicle owner’s policy, which accepted coverage for the permissive driver. The recovery included that liability policy’s limit and available underinsured motorist benefits under the client’s own policy. We also worked on the substantial hospital bill, including a documented discount, without treating the gross settlement as the client’s take-home amount.

​

18. Recovering liability limits while pursuing a separate UIM claim

​

A client’s collision injuries and work limitations led to negotiations with the responsible driver’s insurer. The first bodily injury offer was below the available policy limit.

​

We negotiated the liability settlement up to that limit and pursued the separate underinsured motorist claim. The liability settlement has been paid; the UIM claim remains open. 

​

19. Evaluating each injured person’s claim separately

​

A client required physical therapy following a collision and exhausted available personal injury protection benefits. The liability insurer’s initial offer did not provide the full amount available under its policy.

​

We pursued the client’s individual injury claim and negotiated a liability policy-limit settlement. We also pursued a separate underinsured motorist claim based on the client’s own coverage and treatment history. 

​

20. Examining coverage across more than one insured vehicle

​

A client with a serious back injury faced significant treatment needs. Reviewing the client’s own insurance showed that underinsured motorist benefits associated with more than one vehicle were available under that policy.

​

We pursued those combined benefits and obtained payment of the available UIM limits. 

​

Help with a Hawaii auto accident injury claim

​

The right approach depends on your injuries, the evidence, and the insurance contracts involved. Our Hawaii car accident injury practice helps clients assess those issues. You can also learn about claims involving uninsured drivers and uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage.

​

To discuss your accident with the Law Offices of David W. Barlow, call 808-354-0464 or request a free consultation.

​

Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. These summaries omit identifying details and do not describe every fact, expense, or issue in a matter. A gross settlement is different from the amount a client receives after fees, expenses, and any required payments.